
I first heard of the e waste problem in China after watching Edward Burtynsky's documentary " Manufactured Landscapes"

Impact of Biodiversity Loss on Ocean Ecosystem Services by Boris Worm is about the benefits we get from a high biodiversity. He begins by detailing the loss of population and species in marine ecosystems by human domination. He did experiments and found that that the loss is impairing the oceans ability to provide food, maintain water quality and recover from damage, but it is all still reversible at this point.He then describes the role of biodiversity in an ecosystem. Surveys suggest that it enhances the productivity and stability of an ecosystem. But we do not know the importance on a landscape level. Increasing population of people on the coast so loss of ocean services would be a disaster. He then Details the experiments he conducted to understand the relationship between biodiversity and ecosystem functions and services. In 36 experiments it was found that an increase in biodiversity correlated with an increase in all the processes of the ecosystem. He then studied the record of economically important coastal organisms. He saw huge declines in population This has impaired the processes of coastal ecosystem. He then went larger scale and looked at info on fishing in 64 large marine ecosystems world wide from the U.N. data base. Those that had higher biodiversity were more resistant to collapse and overfishing. This implies that different species play complementary roles to each others survival. He then analyzed data from 44 marine reserves to find if there is chances of recovering from a collapse.He found that it is possible to recover which brings more revenue for the area. He concludes that through sustainable management , pollution control we can invest in the productivity and reliability of the goods the oceans can provide.
At the Shrine of Our Lady of Fatima or Why Political Questions are not all Economic by Mark Sangoff talks about the need for a deeper approach to environmental problems than purely an economic one.He starts by explaining what happened to the community of Lewiston, New York. Radioactive Materials from Manhattan project were buried nearby and when heavy winds blow southerly radon gas is blown into town. This has put the residents at risk of leukemia and related inflictions. Yet corporate officials will not do anything. Between buffalo and Lewiston is a large landfill where no life is found. Overlooking this display is the shrine of our lady Fatima . It is this shrine that mark used for cost benefit analysis. Some people suggest that all environmental problems are when resources cannot be allocated in effeicent ways. This way of thinking is completely at the level of the consumer. They value only what the market can price such as a condo on the beach or a snowmobile for the mountains. This Poses the question, how do you value open space. He then says that each of us have two different ways of thinking. We think as a consumer and as a citizen. the consumer thinks of their individual wants while the citizen acts for the community. He says these dual ways of thinking constantly conflict. For example he voted for passing a bill to tax gas for funding of public transit then he continues to drive his gas guzzling cars. He then asks should the public economy serve the ideals of the citizen or the consumer. He then talks about how the court will take the side of the cost beneficial party instead of passing regulations. Such as when regulations for the amount of cotton dust emitted by a textile manufacturer was declined because it wasn't cost beneficial. He believes the government should do more to balance economic with ideological, aesthetic and moral goals. he then talks about how corners on safety because its cost beneficial . The amount of benzene was limited from 10-1 ppm in 1977 but late the American petroleum institute made a case that was more cost beneficial. This approach treats people as equals but as equals with no value except for their willingness to pay. The ancient world focused more on the community while today we go the other direction. Economist argue there role as policy makers because they are impartial to competing values. Sangoff states we must use our knowledge, wisdom, morality and taste to come up with policies not solely based on whose willing to pay the right price. "No matter how much your willing to pay 3 will never be the square root of 6."
The article Living Downstream: An Ecologist Looks at Cancer and the Environment by Sandra Steingraber, talks about the need for more knowledge on the environmental factors in cases of cancer. Shes begins with a personal story how she had bladder cancer as an young adult. She then talks about the perception that genes are the main cause of cancer; if your in a "cancer family" your sure to get it. she goes on to say that she is adopted, therefore something in the environment must be leading to the cancer trend in the family. Cancer is caused by a mutation where a single rung of the DNA is swapped for another resulting in a change of the gene. She then asks the question what is causing bladder cancer? She found that there are many carcinogens in streams and rivers that we come into contact with and gets into our drinking water.this is from industries, pipe materials and water treatment. She states that we need a better way of regulating these contaminants. She goes on to state there are hurdles to overcome if address cancer's environmental roots. Presently cancer research is focused on inherited cancer from family. She then says that even though cancer causing products have been stopped from being used domestically they still linger in the environment. chemicals such as DDT last in the environment for a long time. Some people are more at risk of cancer than other because of genes but those who work with and live by carcinogens are at high risk no matter what DNA they have. She concludes by saying we need to be guided by the principle of the least toxic alternative which means we need to choose the least harmful way to solve problems.




In the article Restoring Rivers Margaret Palmer and J. Allen discuss the importance of water ways and how to preserve them. Water ways were getting cleaner after 1973 until 1998 when it again became worse. water quality and extreme extraction are both problems concerning the waterways. Disasters such as the creation of a dead zone in the Chesapeake bay have occurred because of the degradation of rivers and streams. These disasters could have been prevented by ecological restoration which is the repairing water ways that can no longer perform essential ecological and social functions. This includes actions such as mitigating floods, providing drinking water and removing excess nutrients from the water. They say that the U.S. needs regulations and federal policies to improve the effectiveness of restoration. Originally waste was dumped in waterways to solve pollution. they also cut down riparian vegetation and filled in wetlands. water quality got worse with increasing industrialization and the paving of cities. in 1960 two-thirds were polluted. pavement over land has changed the way water runoff behaves which in turn changes the behavior of rivers leading to flooding. Attempts have been made by starting projects all over the country such as the planting riparian buffers. Stricter standards on storm runoff has been implemented as well. despite an ever increasing amount of restoration projects the coastal banks continue to show degradation. The government needs to increase its standards of restoration projects. A lot is known about how to effectively restore waterways but this information has not been used in many projects. they the state that federal agencies must adopt standards for successful river restoration. A system to track the projects must be created. National studies must be taken to evaluate the effectiveness of projects. Funding must be used more efficiently and more funding is needed. They conclude by saying that waterways can be restored with proper government application of policies and funding.


The mandate of parks Canada founds on their website (http://www.pc.gc.ca/agen/chart/chartr_E.asp) is first to protect "the natural and cultural heritage of our special places and ensure that they remain healthy and whole." Second it is to give access to and "share the beauty and significance of our natural world and to chronicle the human determination and ingenuity which have shaped our nation. " But can Parks Canada meet this dual mandate? I see this mandate as a balancing act the more people you allow access to the parks the harder it is to protect, but if your to protective no one gets to enjoy the natural beauty these parks have to offer. I was at jasper national park a few years back and i observed that when you allow many people access there tends to be some that don't respect or follow proper park conduct. I saw people litter, walk on and degrade areas that were suppose to be off limits to public i even saw parents encourage there children to try to catch and kill the native fauna. i believe for park Canada to achieve there mandate by only allowing guided tours into the areas they are trying to protect. This way people can have access to the parks and the guides can make sure they do not destroy that which they are trying to protect. Wapusk national park because it is fairly isolated and hard to get to has problems with the amount of people it can give access to. Wapusk has a visitor limit and the only way to access it is through authorized commercial tour operators (http://www.pc.gc.ca/eng/pn-np/mb/wapusk/visit/visit1.aspx). If you ramped up these tour guide operations you could allow more people to experience Wapusk and because their on guided tours people will follow the rules of the parks to preserve the environment.
Most artists use paint and a canvas to create works of art but Andy isn't like most artists. For him Nature is his canvas and his paint. In other words Andy creates his art entirely out of arranging materials found in nature using only his body. Andy says his "remit is to work with nature as a whole"